Sex Drive And Its Effect On Society - 1267 Words

Sex has an extensive history of being an extremely dominant part of our society and our everyday lives. Sex is introduced to us at a very young age and is believed to be of pivotal importance to our development. As we mature, our understanding of sex matures with us. One’s sex drive can be defined as their desire or urge to release tensions through any sexual outlet. The notion of a sex drive and its existence is one that can be debated. There are too many variations of the idea to come to one consensus. Considering most of the evidence provided we could infer that a sex drive does exist. Still, this is not true for each individual case. Sex drive is extremely subjective and is only present if an individual has a desire for the sexual release of tensions we may experience. With little or no desire for this sexual release, there is no persuasive force encouraging a person to be sexual. In the less extreme cases, sex drive can be weakened, becoming easily ignored or channeled through another nonsexual outlet. These individuals have what appears to be a minimized sex drive and it is possible for them to reach personal satisfaction without sex or sexual acts. In the most extreme cases, it seems possible for sex drive to be permanently extinguished, becoming nonexistent. This is what causes the mere existence of a sex drive to be so subjective. While it is commonly believed that we are born with this sexual desire and drive, inclination to satisfy and explore it is not alwaysShow MoreRela tedWhy are Sex Drives Different?843 Words   |  4 PagesWhat comes to mind when male and female sex drives are mentioned? The stereotype as stated by Roy F. Baumeister (2000) would be females have a lower sex drive then males. This statement tends to be accepted by most people in society as the standard, so why would looking into this question be important? Having a â€Å"standard† can be dangerous, because not everyone fits that standard. Thus, understanding the differences can show society what is normal, and how to change the standard that is acceptedRead MoreMale Birth Control Essay861 Words   |  4 Pagespractice â€Å"safe sex†. Introducing the birth control pill for women in the 1960s created a huge controversy between sexual conservatives and the women who would benefit from the pill, but the responsibility still remained in the hands of women. However, as medicine has advanced and the possibility of a male birth control pill has amounted, many wonder i f the same issues would arise if a male birth control pill did in fact become available. In order to understand the effects on society of both individualRead MoreEvaluating Four-Drive Theory in Employee Motivation1090 Words   |  5 PagesBecause of the development of new disciplinary, people now can research human brain and learn more about the drives (including the drives to acquire, bond, comprehend and defend) which underlie human actions. It had many researches mentioning how these drives affect employee motivation in organizations. One of them is the article â€Å"Employee Motivation: A powerful new model†, written by Nitin Nohria (the Richard P. Chapman Professor of Business Administration), Boris Groysberg (an associate professorRead MoreThe Lolita Effect On Children s Health Network1275 Words   |  6 PagesIn Western society, the media hypersexualizes children from birth. However, this hypersexuality is commonly focused on girls aged eight to fifteen (Canadian Wom en’s Health Network). This leads to self-esteem issues, high teenage pregnancy rates, eating disorders, sex trafficking, suicidal thoughts, and actions, and what is called the â€Å"Lolita effect.† This hypersexuality also leads to violent relational abuse, and in boys, has been shown linked with violence (Keating). These all have devastating consequencesRead MoreHowever, these societies are not confined to families, neighborhoods, churches, and cities any600 Words   |  3 PagesHowever, these societies are not confined to families, neighborhoods, churches, and cities any more; the internet brings all societies together into a bigger society and it is hard keep people from meddling within their societies. Morality is different for each person such as the case for abortion, some view it as moral and others don’t. It is hard for everyone to find a common foundation to stand on when it comes to the internet, because of all the different standards set by all these differentRead More Sex Education in School Essay1706 Words   |  7 Pages Sex is something that almost everyone will experience before they die. It is a subject that has been debated about for years. From the debate over birth control to the outbreak of aids. With all this history behind us, sex is becoming even more of an issue. With the new outbreaks of sexually transmitted diseases and the fact that sexually active persons are becoming younger, sex has now become a daily topic. Sex scandals in the media and talk such as who slept with who at last nights kegRead MoreSex-Drive Reducing Medications of Sex Offenders1556 Words   |  7 PagesAdministration of Sex-Drive Reducing Medications of Sex Offenders: Treatment or Punishment? And Ethics, Prisoner Interrogation, National Security and The Media Force Administration of Sex-Drive Reducing Medications of Sex Offenders: Treatment or Punishment? The first article I chose was whether or not it is considered a treatment or a punishment to sex offenders if they are forced, by court order, to take medications that greatly reduce their sex drive. AccordingRead MoreSexuality : Human Sexuality, Sexual Orientation And Sexual Behavior1193 Words   |  5 PagesIntroduction Sexuality encompasses aspects in a person’s life that involves sex and gender identity, sexual orientation and sexual behavior. It encompasses the physical, social and psychological aspects of a person’s sexual behavior. It underpins what an individual is, affects the individual’s life wholesomely and is unique to each and every individual. A general stereotype of sexuality in old people exists in the society. Most people tend to believe that sexuality diminishes with age and that oldRead MoreRap Hop And Hip Hop Culture1550 Words   |  7 Pagesdemeaning them and depicting them as sex objects or subjects of submission to men is Misogyny. Present also is brutality against women descriptions. There have been voluminous scholars talking about it yet the argument is unquenched. Misogyny in hip hop society has its core deep in the American ethos, and it has its outcome on the same nation. Misogyny in songs is taking ring on young persons, and it is swiftly touching t he young females in the black civilization. The effects of Misogyny in hip hop cultureRead MoreNegative Effects of Sex in Advertising1151 Words   |  5 Pagesthe other commercials that you see everyday? They simply use sex. Sex in advertising can be defined as the use of any type of sexual imagery to draw the interest of the consumer to buying a particular product or service. The use of sex in advertising as mentioned earlier is said to have boasted a lot company’s revenues, but it also has its negative side which has caused a lot of problems in societies around the world. The idea of using sex in advertising is a very smart way that advertisers use to

Just War Theory Free Essays

War is said to occur when one state declares hostility against another by which it places the people and resources under its authority to enmity against their adversaries as well as their resources (Gardam J, 1993). According to broadminded ed war historian and theorist Jeffrey Rodgers Hummel, there is an implication of the above definition. In placing its people as well s resources to hostilities, each state is in reality declaring war on three phases; first and foremost as to the other state; second as to the people of the other state; and thirdly as to its own dissenting citizens, should they fail to act in accordance with the State’s demand for manpower and resources (Gardam J, 1993). We will write a custom essay sample on Just War Theory or any similar topic only for you Order Now Going by the above definition offered by Jeffrey R. Hummel, just war would comprise that the war should have a just beginning. That is, it must be declared in reaction to violent behavior; the response has to be reasonable and according to the level of aggression, it has to be begun by an appropriate authority in opposition to appropriate enemy; it has to be conducted in proper manner that is justly†¦that is no harming of innocent people knowingly or intentionally (Gardam J, 1993). The war must have a just origin The just war theory asserts that war should originate only if there is violation of rights and only in self-defense. These rights should be individualistic rights as opposed to those that lead to war, for instance breach of a country’s sovereignty on a realistic altitude. Nevertheless, a difficulty arises at once. The fundamentals necessary to judge the justness of the war’s origin for instance, time and relevant information are not often available at the point war is declared. In deciding the idea of German Catholic participating in war during the Nazi period, it was once remarked by a publisher that â€Å"A scientific judgement concerning causes and origins of the war is absolutely impossible today because the pre-requisites for such a judgement are not available to us. This must wait until a later time when the documents of both sides are available† (Allen C, 1966). The war must be a reasonable response As per the theory, it is grimacing for a provoker to be shot whether he acted on purpose or accidentally. While exercising self-defense the level of force utilized has to be proportional to the force used by the aggressor, while the aim of the responsive force should be articulated on the tenets of protection or restitution. Thus, a war with a just origin should have first exhausted all lesser force employment that could have consummated the desired objectives. It becomes crucial to elucidate one idea that the war should be left with the people with, that the state has consigned their rights of defense with. The question is whether States’ declaration of war places all its citizens to take part in hostilities even though a small proportion of them have been aggressed. Secondly, does aggression directed towards those consigned with the right of defense bind all others under declaration of war? If so, the contract appears to be calculated to enhance the level of violence of any differences as opposed to providing protection or restitution. The war has to be declared by a proper authority and against a proper enemy. Under this theory, the proper authority to exercise a right of self-defense against an aggressor is an agent or individual upon whose rights have been violated. Thus, under this heading a state is interpreted to be a proper authority. Here the assumption is that the war is declared against a state that is proper enemy. Just war should have a just ending On the ordinary observation, a just war (precisely since, it is not a campaign) should finish with the reinstatement of the status quo ante. The model case is a war of hostility, which ends justly when the provoker has been conquered, his attack repulsed, the old boundaries reinstated. Conceivably this is not quite enough for a just ending: the wounded state might merit compensations from the aggressor state, so that the damage the aggressor’s forces meted out (Gardam J, 1993). In considering the atomic bombing of Japan, Was the bombing just? Was it moral? The use of atomic bombs was not meant to be confined to military targets, as these are obviously weapons mass destruction and could not fail to terrorize the civilians. From point of view of justice, discarding the rule that excludes civilians from deliberate attack represented a grave injustice from which the world requires to recover. If the aim was to end the war this could have been achieved without dropping those bombs on civilians (Gardam J, 1993). Appearing in the Nation, an article by Richard Falk titled â€Å"Defining a just war† in issue of Oct 29, he asserted that the war in Afghanistan qualified to be the first just war since World War II (Roberts A, 1993-1994). Although in the issue Falk went on to warn that the justice of the cause could be â€Å"negated by the injustice of improper means and excessive ends†, he did not relinquish his original affirmation. This utterance came from one of the prominent and respected advocates of international peace and justice. How true was his assertion about just war in Afghanistan (Roberts A, 1993-1994)? Interpreting Falk’s position as saying US war could be just, as long as it adhered to the ideologies he articulated, his argument nevertheless was manifestly wrong. First, on the ground that the principles were broken as of the start of the war and secondly, on the dismissal of alternative action that could have solved the impasse through the United Nations. How could this war be justified if the bombings lead to starvation of many millions of Afghanistan’s due inability of aid agencies to deliver their services to the civilians prior to the felling of the first bomb? On the other hand, prior knowledge of humanitarian crisis that could be occasioned by bombing serves to negate it from being construed as just war. First, the war did not meet the criteria of discrimination (not to harm civilians). Secondly, on the proportionality of the force (force should not be greater than the provoking cause), the force employed was greater compared to that of the aggressor (Roberts A, 1993-1994). The war in Afghanistan largely did not meet the criterion of necessity that calls upon force not to be applied if there are other non-violent means available. Before the onset of the bombing, Taliban Ambassador to Pakistan had proposed that they were ready to try Osama bin Laden if America provided evidence connecting him to the attacks in the New York and Washington. Going by the words of this ambassador, it is clear that this war could have been avoided if US offered the evidence they were demanding in order to prosecute the culprit (Mintz A, 1993). In addition, the ambassador had indicated that under Islamic law legal proceedings could begin. Thus, infact trial could begin pertaining to the raised allegations followed by evidence being provided in court. However, what happened is that Washington refused to offer evidence, declared its demands were not subject to negotiation and started bombardment of Afghanistan (Mintz A, 1993). Whether Taliban’s offer was serious or not, Washington never bothered to follow, conversely going to war faced with such conditions eliminates the criterion of necessity. Vietnam War first assumed the aspect of political dimension with many at last being pressed towards moral arguments. Of course, the war was seen to be completely irresponsible, and one that could not be won. Its costs, even if the Americans were egoistic, were above the normal. The war was fought unjustly since it involved a lot of brutality by the Americans, a factor that was seen by many as the one that led to the defeat. In a war for â€Å"hearts and minds† as opposed to land and resources, justice stands out to be the main aspects to victory. Vietnam War served to educate states that there was a need for state to fight justly and to crown it all, justice has become military necessity. Vietnam was the first war that saw the need for emphasizing the jus in belle principle. It enumerated that Wars unpopular at home should not be fought in addition to wars whereby the state is unwilling to commit its resources. As mentioned earlier Vietnam War was based on doubtful justice and the war was fought unjustly, as it irritated the civilian population. By losing the hearts and minds of the civilians led to the loosing of the whole war. Modern warfare requires that there be support from different civilian populations, expanding past the population facing instantaneous risk. Nevertheless, moral regard for civilians at risk is crucial in winning great support of the war. America has in the past-confused just wars as crusades, as if a war can be just only where the forces of good outweigh those of evil. However, as for George Bush (elder) he appeared to understand that war, is properly a war of armies, a combat between combatants, through which the citizens should be protected. In good faith, there was nothing of a just war in Iraq bombing in 1991. The civilians there were not protected, since there was destruction of electricity networks as well as water purification plants (Mintz A, 1993). Demolition of infrastructure, that is, significant for civilian existence was rampant during the Gulf War. Nevertheless, American approach in Gulf War was due to compromise among what justice would have necessitated. There was no controlled bombing and collectively as opposed to Korea or Vietnam, targeting was far more unlimited and selective. Conclusion Many people acknowledge that we are faced with moral duty to avoid the evils of war. However, this realization poses many difficult questions, when as responsible individuals we witness tormenting injustices for instance, ‘ethnic cleansing’ (Gardam J, 1993). With millions of lives being risked by war, one is bound to consider if war should ever be justified and if so, for what purpose? In answering the above, it is first important to consider principles of just war theory and finally correlate these principles to historical as well as ongoing conflicts. On the just cause, figures like Ronald Reagan are seen to assert that whether in self-defense or defense for others, remain the only classified cause that justifies waging war. There is a need to justify military intervention in secessionist or revolutionary wars. The conduct of war should also be in accordance with the principles of discrimination and proportionality. Civilians should not be directly targeted ad costs of military action should be proportionate to the expected advantages of ruining military targets. Reference Allen C. Isbell, (1966). War and Conscience Abilene, Texas: Biblical Research Press, p. 82. Gardam, Judith Gail. (1993) Proportionality and Force in International Law. American Journal of International Law, Volume 87, Issue 3, 391-413. Mintz, Alex. (1993). The Decision to Attack Iraq: A Noncompensatory Theory of Decision Making. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Volume 37, Issue 4, 595-618. Roberts, Adam. (Winter, 1993-1994). The Laws of War in the 1990-91 Gulf Conflict. International Security, Volume 18, Issue 3 134-181. How to cite Just War Theory, Essays

Watergate Essay Research Paper On the night free essay sample

Watergate Essay, Research Paper On the dark of Saturday, June 17,1972, constabulary arrested five burglars in the act of teasing the Democratic National Headquarters at the Watergate Apartment composite. The five work forces were discovered crouched behind a desk have oning concern suits, transporting a big amount of hard currency and walky-talkies. The five work forces were James W. McCord, Jr. , Bernard L. Barker, Frank A. Sturgis, Virgilio R. Gonzales, and Eugenio R. Martinez. The following twenty-four hours, June 18, the work forces were charged with second-degree burglary. Amazingly, what appeared to be an mean burglary unraveled into one of the greatest political dirts of all time. Upon the inquiring of one of the suspects, McCord revealed his individuality as a former CIA Security adviser. Arousing involvement, newsmans further investigated and discovered that he worked for the Committee to Re-Elect the President ( CRP, ) making a direct nexus to the President of the United States. We will write a custom essay sample on Watergate Essay Research Paper On the night or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page In August 1968, Nixon stated at a Republican convention # 8220 ; America is in problem today non because her people have failed but because her leaders have failed. # 8221 ; This dry quotation mark foreshadows the death and corruptness of one of the most controversial presidents, Richard Milhouse Nixon. The dirt known as Watergate was non an stray event. In fact, condemnable actions took topographic point throughout the full Nixon disposal. They began when Nixon was faced with the Vietnam War. Nixon started in secret bombing Cambodia, taking at North-Vietnamese military personnels. After this was revealed, most of the populace was upset since it was incorrect to bomb a state that was non involved in the war. Upset that the bombardments were discovered, Nixon was determined to happen out who was leaking information to the imperativeness. His despair led to a series of condemnable Acts of the Apostless and corruptness. The disposal bugged the telephones of suspected authorities functionaries. These were the first of 17 wiretaps used to uncover people leaking harmful information. Installation wiretaps without a justice # 8217 ; s permission is illegal because it disregards the right of freedom of address. In order to forestall other leaks, Nixon told John Ehrlichman, main domestic advisor, to make a particular clandestine organisation to halt the escape of secret information. This group became known as the Plumbers, working out of the White House cellar. The corruptness neer stopped. Nixon # 8217 ; s determination to occupy Cambodia instigated many public anti-war presentations. These presentations became a job when four pupils were killed by the Ohio National Guard at Kent State University. Desiring to cognize more about the anti-war motion, Nixon hired Tom Charles Huston to investigate. He devised a program which consisted of reading people # 8217 ; s mail, interrupting into places, and listening to people # 8217 ; s telephone calls. Nixon approved the Huston Plan in 1970. In 1971, Nixon continued to coerce White House Plutos to acquire information on his enemies. Howard Hunt and Gordon Liddy so created the CRP ( besides known as Creep to Nixon oppositions ) in order to pattern illegal actions on Democratic oppositions. This corruptness in the White House continued into President Nixon # 8217 ; s run for re-election. The codification name for the plan intended to hassle the Democrat was # 8220 ; Sedan Chair. # 8221 ; Worried about the approaching election, Nixon created the CRP. Current poles suggested that the populace favored the Democratic campaigner Senator Edmund Muskie. In an effort to disable Muskie, several programs were instituted. First, a Republican undercover agent applied for a occupation with Muskie as his personal chauffeur. The chauffeur reported everything he overheard in the auto to Nixon and the CRP. The following measure was for members of the CRP to rouse electors in the center of the dark stating they were working for Muskie, inquiring for their ballot. The CRP aimed at other possible democratic campaigners, every bit good, such as Edward Kennedy. In the concluding CRP dirt, Liddy was asked to invent a program to destruct the Democratic run. Liddy # 8217 ; s original program called for snatch oppositions, utilizing cocottes to abash outstanding Democrats, and an intricate wiretapping plan. After being submitted to the caput of the CRP, John Mitchell ( former Attorney General, ) and White House attorney John Dean, the program was rapidly rejected. Liddy created another program which was eventually approved. This program included the wiretapping of phones of oppositions, get downing with Larry O # 8217 ; Brien, the Democratic Party Chairman, at the Democratic Headquarters in the Watergate composite. The full program cost a amount of 250,000 dollars. The first housebreaking was a success, on May 28, 1972, teasing the telephones. In an effort to put in a 2nd series of bugs, the burglars were caught. The White House did non accept duty for the offense therefore get downing a long drawn out cover-up. The ill-famed Watergate cover-up began. Immediately following the burglary, top functionaries of the White House and CRP were notified. No 1 felt that they should acknowledge that the burglars had White House blessing. They kept it a secret fearing the consequence of Republican functionaries being linked to a political burglary. There were excessively many other burglaries and political dirts to put on the line promotion. Secrecy was in order It must be kept a secret. Jeb Stuart Magruder was notified, by Liddy, of the apprehension and of McCord # 8217 ; s direct nexus to the CRP. Worried, Magruder met with John Mitchell to discourse the state of affairs. They decided that if they cleared McCord from the instance, there would be no connexion to the White House. Their lone job was that McCord was already in gaol. They decided to call Attorney General Richard G. Kleindienst to acquire McCord out. Kleindienst was highly annoyed for being put on the topographic point, and could non liberate McCord. The first measure of the cover-up had failed. Other links started being discovered between the burglary and the White House. The top adjutant to the President, John Ehrlichman was notified that one of the burglars had a notebook with White House employee E. Howard Hunt # 8217 ; s name in it. The 3rd nexus was the 100 dollar measures found on the five suspects. These measures were all traced back to assorted people who made political contributions to the CRP. In look intoing the mistake in the burglary, Liddy accepted full incrimination. He told Dean he was ready to be shot to decease if it would assist. In the followers yearss after the housebreaking, newspapers which indicated political sabotage were destroyed. The content of Howard Hunt # 8217 ; s safe was locked off for a piece but finally given to the manager of the FBI, L. Patrick Gray Jr. Gray was instructed to destruct the implying paperss. The public probe of the housebreaking was conducted by the FBI, the # 8220 ; fox guarding the henhouse. # 8221 ; When FBI agents began inquiring excessively many inquiries, Haldeman devised a program to halt the FBI probe. CIA agent, Vernon Walters, would advise Gray to halt investigation in order to keep national security. Haldeman discusses this program with Nixon on June 23, 1972. Later it was revealed that all White House conversations were taped. In this conversation, Nixon agrees to Haldeman # 8217 ; s program to halt FBI agents from deriving information on Watergate. Nixon inculpates himself, admiting that he knew of top adjutant John Mitchell # 8217 ; s engagement in the housebreaking, for engagement in the cover-up and dirt. In the terminal of June, the White House and the CRP began doing payments to the burglars for legal costs and to back up their households while in gaol. They besides paid # 8220 ; hush money # 8221 ; to the burglars to do certain they would non state the tribunal who they were working for. A sum of over 220,000 dollars was spent over the following three months. During the months to follow the interruption in, the Justice Department investigated burglary and a expansive jury listened to the grounds. The test focused on the five burglars, since there was no strong grounds against the White House. As things resumed to normal, Nixon, on August 23, was nominated by the Republicans for his 2nd term as president. In his address after the nomination, Nixon stated that John Dean had conducted an probe of the Watergate housebreaking and that no 1 on the White House staff, no 1 in the disposal, soon employed, was involved in T his eccentric incident. What truly hurts in affairs of this kind is non the fact that they occur, because fanatic people in runs do things that are incorrect. What truly hurts is if you attempt to cover it up. The undermentioned hebdomad, the expansive jury finished listening to grounds and indicted the five burglars plus Liddy and Hunt, who were found at Watergate the dark of the housebreaking. The Justice Department concluded that there was no ground to look any farther, since there was no grounds which points to anyone else. Apparently, several newsmans disagreed with that statement. Reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, of The Washington Post, were assigned top the instance. After thorough probe, with several connexions, Woodward and Bernstein wrote and published the first major narrative linking the White House to Watergate. They discovered the money nexus between the burglars and the CRP. Twenty-five thousand dollars were collected by the CRP and placed into Bernard Barker # 8217 ; s Bank history, one of the indicted burglars. The cheque was from Kenneth H. Bahlberg. He Donated the money to Maurice Stans, the main money-raiser for Nixon, intended for the CRP. Other newsmans followed this narrative and revealed that Stans and others working for Nixon had laundered 100s of 1000s of dollars from people through Mexico. Although the General Accounting Office felt that the CRP had broke the jurisprudence, in roll uping money, A.G. Kleindienst said nil of the money when the indictments were publically announced a few hebdomads subsequently. Woodward and Bernstein were the most successful newsmans in bring outing the Watergate dirt. They began by speaking to many people, in secret at dark. Many CRP employees would non talk, fearing their occupation. There most success was based on Woodward # 8217 ; s secret beginning known as Deep Throat. Deep Throat worked in the Nixon Administration, near to the disposal, and knew everything that had taken topographic point. Because of his political repute, Deep Throat did non desire his name revealed. Woodward was the lone 1 who knew who he was and communicated with him utilizing his flower pot as a mark. The two would run into in secret in a garage in the center of the dark. The editor of the Post trusted Deep Throat, for he was ever right. Deep Throat warned Woodward to watch out, the White House was upset at the narratives they have been publication. Anger spread throughout the Nixon disposal in late September. Woodward and Bernstein obtained secret information about John Mitchel. The tandem discovered that as A.G. , before Kleindienst, Mitchell was in charge of a secret run fund through the CRP and had given blessing for the money to be used to descry on the Democrats. It is extremely illegal for a authorities functionary to work for a political campaigner while in office, particularly since the A.G. is the highest graded jurisprudence hatchet man in the state. Before printing their narrative, Bernstein called Mitchell tardily at dark to inquire for a remark. Mitchell became highly angry and yelled at Bernstein. It # 8217 ; s all been denied. Katie Graham [ publishing house of the Washington Post ] is gon na acquire her # $ % stuck in a large fat wringer if that # 8217 ; s published. Good Christ # 8230 ; .You fellows got a great ballgame traveling. Equally shortly as your throuh paying Ed Williams [ the Post s attorney ] and the remainder of those chaps, we # 8217 ; rhenium traveling to make a narrative on all of you. Indirectly endangering the newspaper, Woodward and Bernstein included Mitchell # 8217 ; s curse in the article. The two published that Haldeman, the adult male closest to Nixon, besides controlled the secret money fund used against the democrats. Although this was true, the newsmans said that Hugh Sloan, former financial officer for the CRP, had told the expansive jury look intoing Watergate that Haldeman was in charge, but Sloan neer did. Haldeman rapidly denied this charge, with no grounds against him. This important error brought unfavorable judgment to the paper, while doing the White House happy. With in a few hebdomads, Nixon won re-election. The test for the seven indicted work forces began on January 8, 1973, Chief justice of the U.S. District Court, John Sirica, presiding. Howard Hunt pleaded guilty, but the staying six pleaded not-guilty. As clip went on, every burglar, except for McCord pled guilty. Liddy and McCord were found guilty. Taking the incrimination for the burglary, none of the work forces would speak about the CRP, maintaining their engagement a secret. Although things appeared to be running swimmingly for the Nixon disposal, their inevitable destiny came easy to stop as their cover-up fell apart. Following the burglary test, in March 1973, the Senate voted to put up a particular commission to decide the enigmas of Watergate making public hearings. The White House publically announced that it would collaborate with the hearings. Dean subsequently revealed that the White House would # 8220 ; effort to keep the probe and do it every bit hard as possible to acquire information and informants # 8230 ; The ultimate end would be to discredit the hearings. # 8221 ; When Nixon nominated Patrick Gray to go the lasting manager of the FBI, the Senate needed to O.K. . They would merely O.K. him after being questioned about Watergate. Gray revealed to the Senate his connexion with Nixon and the CRP. Following Gray # 8217 ; s confession, Howard Hunt, before being sentenced to prison, demanded 120,000 dollars from Dean or he excessively would squeal. It was so, when Dean realized that there would be no terminal to the demand of money and everything would finally come out. Dean met with Nixon to discourse the state of affairs. Dean stated, # 8220 ; # 8230 ; We have a malignant neoplastic disease within, near to the presidential term, that is turning # 8230 ; . # 8221 ; The two decided to pay Hunt 75,000 more dollars to remain quiet for a small piece. The major factor in the unraveling of the political cover-up came from James McCord. Before traveling to prison, McCord wrote Judge Sirica a missive. He explained that throughout the test there had been political force per unit area for the suspects to stay soundless and plead guilty. He elaborated on the bearing false witness during the test and stated that there were many others involved in Watergate, who were neer mentioned in the test. Along with his missive, McCord told the Senate Watergate Committee that Dean and Magruder were involved, faulting them for much of the dirt. At this point, Dean got a attorney and decided to state the truth, acknowledging that he had lied at the test of the burglars. Recognizing he was in problem, Magruder decided to state the truth as good. Magruder and Dean told the populace that Haldeman and Ehrlichman, Nixon # 8217 ; s two top Plutos, were involved in the cover- up. After Dean told Nixon that he was speaking to the prosecuting officers, Nixon used Dean as a scape-goat, faulting him for the cover-up. Magruder told prosecuting officers that Mitchell had approved the Watergate housebreaking. At that point, Nixon # 8217 ; s disposal was in the populace limelight. Recognizing he had to settle things and on April 30, Nixon announced the resignment of Haldeman, Ehrlichman, and Kleindiest, while disregarding John Dean. The probe of Watergate, instantly reopened. After the surrender of A.G. Kleindiest, Congress wanted an foreigner working on the Watergate probe. Nixon moved Elliot L. Richardson into the Justice Department, who promised to put an foreigner on the instance. Richardson chose Archibold Cox, who was given the rubric of particular prosecuting officer and was assigned to happen out what illegal actions took topographic point. As Cox began his probe, the Senate Watergate Committee, under Senator Sam Ervin, began their # 8217 ; s as good. The Committee # 8217 ; s first informant was McCord. McCord acted guiltless, stating that he broke in because he felt there must hold been a good ground for the wiretapping if John Dean and A.G. John Mitchell approved it. The 2nd informant was Bernard Barker. He told the commission that the other burglars did it so that Hunt would assist them and the Cubans. Hunt, under the name of Eduardo, represented Cuban release to them. they wanted to liberate Cuba from Communist regulation of Fidel Castro. Dean, excessively, agree to attest to the Committee if he was given unsusceptibility. Sirica gave him limited unsusceptibility which truly had no consequence in the long tally. At that, Dean began to state the universe of the Watergate dirt.

The Case Against Capital Punishment essays

The Case Against Capital Punishment essays Whitehead 1 A Moratorium on The Death Penalty Should Be Enacted In Illinois Due to the recent releases of newly exonerated Death Row inmates, individuals and organizations are calling for a moratorium- a cooling off period for state executions. The cases of just a few inmates makes it apparent that this would be a necessary step to save innocent lives. After 17 years in prison, Illinois Death Row inmate Anthony Porter was released from jail after a judge threw out his murder conviction following the introduction of new evidence. This reversal of fortune came just two days before Porter was to be executed. As reported in USA Today, Porter's release was the result of investigative research as conducted by a Northwestern University professor and students. The evidence gathered suggested that Porter had been wrongly convicted. Were these new revelations and the subsequent release of Porter a lucky break or a freak occurrence? Not likely, reports DeWayne Wickham, also of USA Today. He points out that since the reinstatement of the death penalty in the United States in 1976, of those sentenced to death, 490 people have been executed while 76 have been freed from Death Row. This calculates into one innocent person being released from Death Row for every six individuals that were executed. This figure correlates with the 1996 U.S. Department of Justice report that indicates that over a 7-year period, beginning in 1989, when DNA evidence in various cases was tested, 26% of primary suspects were exonerated. This has led some to conclude that a similar percentage of inmates presently serving time behind bars may have been wrongly convicted prior to the advent of forensic DNA typing. Amnesty International, in its 1998 report "Fatal Flaws: Innocence and the Death Penalty", supports the American Bar Association's call ...

5 Tips for Writing an Amazing Villanova Essay

5 Tips for Writing an Amazing Villanova Essay SAT / ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips Villanova University is a private, Catholic research university in Pennsylvania. With a 36 percent acceptance rate, it’s considered moderately competitive- but even that level has an average GPA just shy of 4.0. But acceptance to Villanova isn’t just about your test scores and GPA; you’ll also need to nail the Villanova supplement essay, rounding out your application with a strong representation of yourself.In this guide, we’ll cover all of Villanova’s essay prompts and how to best answer them, including potential topics and pitfalls. Find yourself a quiet place and a good study playlist. What Are the Villanova Essay Prompts? Villanova University only accepts the Common Application. In addition to the required Common Application essay question, you’ll be writing one additional supplement specifically for Villanova. Just one supplemental essay is required, but you’ll have three prompts to choose from. Your response should be one page, double-spaced, in length. No prompt is inherently better than the others - pick whichever appeals to you most. Each one is unique to Villanova, and they all have some unique twists on the expected essay format. We believe that all members of our community should be committed to diversity, equity and inclusion. How would you contribute to this at Villanova? At first, this prompt might look like a typical â€Å"diversity essay.† It mentions diversity, equity, and inclusion, and asks how you’ll contribute However, the first part of the question says that â€Å"all members of our community should be committed to†¦.† Instead of asking what you’ll contribute to their diverse community, they’re instead asking what you’ll do to foster diversity. That could mean bringing your unique experiences to campus, but it could also mean looking at how you, personally, will help ensure that everybody feels welcomed and appreciated. How will you contribute to the commitment to diversity? This prompt is fairly unique because it doesn’t just want to know about what separates you from the rest. Villanova also wants to know how you’ll fit in with other students and appreciate their stories and backgrounds. The use of the word ‘community’ tells us that this is a campus that values the relationships students build with one another. Appreciating and celebrating diversity is part of that mission. To answer this question, think about the communities you belong to and the ways that they intersect with one another. You can also consider times when you’ve been immersed in another culture- truly immersed, not just watching or participating briefly- and what that meant to you. Be sure that you’re always answering the question of how you’ll commit to diversity at Villanova, not just what you’ve done in the past. A past experience, such as attending a traditional Indian wedding, might have led you to appreciate how different another culture’s celebrations can be, but Villanova wants to know what you’ll do next. Will you make a point to attend or organize different celebrations on campus? What does your experience with diversity, whether your own or someone else’s, inspire you to do to foster a welcoming community? On an individual basis, how will you commit to ensuring that the community is full of diversity, equity, and inclusion? When answering this question, avoid coming off as patronizing or condescending. Though a trip to build wells for impoverished communities may have had good intentions, these trips can sometimes do more harm than good. Likewise, volunteering at a soup kitchen isn’t all the impressive if the message you come away with is that you’re glad you’re not homeless. Instead of focusing on yourself and your feelings, take the experience and turn it into actionable ideas. â€Å"Because I saw firsthand how people all around me are suffering, I devoted every Saturday to fundraising for the homeless, a routine I plan to continue at Villanova,† is a lot stronger than, â€Å"Because I saw firsthand how people all around me are suffering, I decided I would spend time every day writing down something I’m grateful for.† Saint Augustine believed in the essential connection between the mind and the heart. Tell us about a time that your mind and heart were in conflict and how that was resolved. College applications will often ask for an event where your views were challenged and you learned from it. This question is a little different- instead of being an outside challenge, it’s an internal one. Still, Villanova wants to know about how you respond to challenges and how you learn from them. Consider times where you’ve been in conflict with yourself and how you ultimately came to a conclusion. What strategies did you use? Were you ultimately happy with your choice? For example, maybe you struggled with a choice to attend an expensive summer camp that specialized in the field you want to study or to spend your summer working. Both options would be beneficial, but you wanted the summer camp more- only you weren’t sure how you were going to pay for it. Whatever option you chose, there’s an essay to be found there; maybe you spent the summer working to save up to attend next year, or maybe you sold a video game console you hadn’t played in a while to make sure you could attend this year. The key is that your heart wants one thing (a great summer spent at camp) while your mind wants another (the money to attend that camp) and you found a way to solve the problem. Remember that the prompt states Saint Augustine’s belief in a connection between the mind and heart. How did your ultimate resolution lead to a greater understanding of what both your heart and mind wanted? Were you able to bridge the gap? For this question, avoid topics that are too shallow or that aren’t really conflicts. Don’t write about trying to choose which friend you wanted to spend the weekend with unless it was a really deep decision, and stay away from spending too much time on choices with answers that seem obvious, like whether you should study or play video games. Dig deep on this question and pick something with a clear narrative. Your essay should showcase something about you, whether it’s your work ethic, your passion, or your caring for others. "Each of us strengthens all of us" is a concept that resonates deeply in the Villanova community. While this phrase may mean many different things, one aspect is that Villanovans rely on each other. Share a situation when you have needed help and what you have taken away from this experience. Colleges, especially research universities like Villanova, are all about community and collaboration. You might have a particularly brilliant mind, but that’s not all it takes to succeed- the ability to work with others is also key, and Villanova wants to hear about how you recognize those who have helped you get to where you are. This is a good opportunity to be humble and acknowledge the support you’ve had along the way. Think about self-reflection, including why you needed help in a particular situation and how the support you received changed your thinking or improved you in some way. This prompt invites you to share your understanding of the importance of collaboration bydiscussing an experience in which others helped you achieve something. Don’t spend too much time worrying about choosing an experience or situation that’s particularly impressive- instead, focus on something that really demonstrates how important a good team can be. The biggest thing to avoid in answering this question is prioritizing your achievement over the assistance you received. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t write about a great achievement- if you won an impressive award or invented something new, definitely share that!- but rather that you should focus on showcasing the support that got you there, such as your mother spending time teaching you how to connect circuits or your teacher spending time after school to coach you through curating a perfect photography portfolio. Show Villanova you understand how important it is to work as a team to achieve great things, and you'll be set to impress! Believe it or not, relaxation is an important part of writing your college essays. Key Tips for Writing the Villanova Essay Though Villanova’s essay prompts are targeted specifically for their school, there are quite a few guidelines you can follow to make your essay strong regardless of what school you’re applying for. Brainstorm Brainstorming doesn’t have to be an intensive process. Beginning a project is often the hardest part; taking a minute or five to get a bunch of ideas down on paper, regardless of their quality, lets you get to work without pressure. Take a deep breath, set a timer, and start jotting down as many ideas as you can think of. Once you’re done, pick the ones that sound most appealing and move on to the next step. Outline Now that you have some ideas, you can start spinning them into outlines. Take a few of the ideas that are most appealing to you and start answering the supplemental questions that should come up in your essay. For example, if you’re answering the first prompt, you should not only be thinking about your personal experiences with diversity, but also how you hope to support equity at Villanova. Sketch out a brief plan for each topic. If you find you don’t have enough points to make, it’s probably not the right idea. Repeat until you have a few outlines to choose from, and then choose the one that you feel strongest about. Write Now that you already have an outline, it’s far easier to actually write your essay. On your first draft, don’t worry too much about staying within the page limit. Don’t even worry about word choice or having something you’re ready to show somebody else. Just focus on getting all of your ideas down on the page so that you have something to do for the next stage. Edit Now comes the point where you start taking what you’ve done and turning it into gold. Editing isn’t just about fine-tuning your grammar and spelling; read your draft aloud to find places where your sentences run on too long, or places where you’ve used the wrong word. Cut extra words and take out sections that aren’t serving your thesis. Be brutal; you can always add things back in if you find you miss them! Get Feedback Once you’ve done a few editing passes on your essay, it’s time for the scariest part: showing it to others. Ask a few people who are invested in your success but who aren’t likely to be too harsh or overly kind in their suggestions- teachers, coaches, and other authority figures are generally good choices- to take a look at your essay and let you know what they think. Let them mark up your draft with any mistakes that they find, and set all that feedback aside for a bit. It’s a good time to take a break from your essay so that you can come back to it with fresh eyes. Revise Now that you’ve had some time away from your essay, it’s time to revise. Take all that feedback you received and consider it. You don’t have to fix anything that doesn’t feel right to you, but do consider why your reviewers may have made that suggestion. Does your essay lack clarity? Could you have chosen a better word? Why are they confused? Always be sure that your essay sounds like you wrote it, though. Remember: your essay is meant to showcase the things that make you unique. If it reads like every other students’ application, it’s not working right! If one of your readers has made big suggestions that don’t sound like something you’d say, rephrase them until they do, or just don’t use them. It’s more important that your essay represents you. What’s Next? A great essay is just one part of a successful Villanova application. Find out what ACT scores and GPA the admissions office is looking for with this handy guide! If you're seeking financial aid from Villanova, this guide to their tuition and financial aid will help you figure out how much you need and how much you can expect to get. Though Villanova has some unique considerations for their essays, there are some common tricks and strategies you can use to write your college essay. This guide covers some of the best ways to ensure your application essay is a success! Want to write the perfect college application essay? Get professional help from PrepScholar. Your dedicated PrepScholar Admissions counselor will craft your perfect college essay, from the ground up. We'll learn your background and interests, brainstorm essay topics, and walk you through the essay drafting process, step-by-step. At the end, you'll have a unique essay that you'll proudly submit to your top choice colleges. Don't leave your college application to chance. Find out more about PrepScholar Admissions now:

Time management Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Time management - Assignment Example Another skill that I have acquired is the importance of team work especially when dealing with sociological challenges that have an implication on the economic performance of any country. This is evident on the initiative to involve various individuals including counselors, mentors, law enforcement officers, and clinical officers. Through the collaboration of the various professionals with diversified skills and experience, the problems faced by juvenile adolescent males will be significantly mitigated. Proper time management Proper time management and scheduling of activities is a major skill that I have gained though the program proposal. I have understood that for the success of any program, it is imperative to allocate adequate time to ensure each and every activity is effectively undertaken. In this program, the major activities included training on time management, counseling, training on the entrepreneurial skills, communication skills and group mentoring. To ensure that the p articipants will have adequate time to learn the various skills as outlined on the time table, I have indicated the time and the occurrence of the activities. In the same way, I have acquired skills on how to prepare a work plan that involves the date of the commencement of the activities as well as the deadline and the occurrence of the activities. This is a very crucial skill that I will put into practice during my future careers as a project manager. The importance of program evaluation In the process of preparing the program proposal, my skills of program evaluation have been enhanced. Most importantly, I have gained an extensive knowledge on how to implement logic model during evaluating my future program as an administrator (McLaughlin and Jordan, 1999). In addition, I have understood on how to put in place the appropriate inputs during evaluation in order to attain the preset program objectives. Effective allocation of resources, staff support and recruitment In the contempor ary business world, stiff competition has been experienced as firms compete for the available resources to maximize their outputs. Through this program proposal, I have gained an appropriate knowledge on how to allocate the available resources to ensure that goals of a program are achieved. In addition, during the preparation of the line item budget, I was exposed to various expenses that a program should cover in order to retain a motivated work force. These expenses include salaries, Medicaid, health insurance, professional dues, training as well as travelling and car allowances. By covering these expenses, employee’s productivity is improved and the continuity of the program is enhanced. Similarly, I have gained skills on how to undertake employee’s recruitment process to ensure that the activities of the program are on the hands of experienced and well educated personnel. Searching for sources of funds In my efforts to prepare the program proposal, I have gained sk ills on how to search for appropriate sources of funds that will provide adequate financial assistance during the implementation of programs especially those dealing with juvenile delinquency and youth education. It is worth to note that various state, local and federal agencies have put in place various eligibility criteria that beneficiaries must adopt in order

Progressive Era through the Great Depression Essay - 1

Progressive Era through the Great Depression - Essay Example senators (Anderson, 2006). The nation struggled with difficulties because of industrialization and development, in the period of Progressive Era (1900–1920). City and middle-class reform crusade reinforced the administration having a superior role in managing such matters as the control of large trade and the well-being of the community. Several of its attainments were created on struggles of previous restructuring activities. For instance, the federal income tax policy and the direct election of senators were a part of the Mainstream package, and Ban on liquor production and its use. The program had received support from both Democrats and Republicans. Theodore Roosevelt became US President in 1901 even though he was the youngest one to hold the Presidential office. He had substantial political knowledge and served in various high level offices. During his administration from 1901 to 1909, 44 antitrust activities were filed counter to the nations major companies, comprising the Northern Securities Company. However, the principle of the presidents approach was that he noted among ‘good’ and ‘bad’ trusts and sturdily chosen to control companies for the wellbeing of people rather than causing damage them. The procedure of rebating was removed through the ‘Elkins Act’ (1903), and the ‘Hepburn Act’ (1906) permitted the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) to set maximum railroad charges. Americans expressed the fear that meat infected or covered in rat stools was treated and sold to the public. Senate responded to the disclosures by passing the ‘Pure Food and Drug Act’ (1906) that banned the production, sale, or carriage of food or drugs in interstate trade that had been infected. President Roosevelt vigorously endorsed the preservation of the nations natural resources. Roosevelt’s government set aside